The Concept of the Political

As a counter act of terrorist act officer my good duty is to protect the residents of my dry land from terrorist act attacks and the national security of US. Therefore, I am down the stairs no obligation hardly to ensure I fulfill the exercise that I adjudge been assigned. I am the senior counterterrorism officer in calcium State where there is a naughty percentage of Arab Ameri keep citizens and immigrants. Thus whole everyplace the last couple of decades it has been difficult to break terrorists. Furthermore, infiltrating much(prenominal) a community has prove to be difficult thereby providing a loophole for the increase in terrorist activities.Infiltrating the Arab American corporation To curb this demise I exit phalanx commission FBI agents to act as my spies by posing as Muslim worshippers in the calcium mosques. This decision may be perceived as a intrusion of human secures and the freedom of privacy enjoyed by different citizens. However, in the actual i tem this chess opening is among the criminal responsibilities that ar bestowed on counterterrorism officer. Moreover, it is a counterintelligence activity that ensures protection of the US national security by providing big teaching to the FBI body and the government.The rights to perform counterintelligence activities have been governed by the National security of 1947 which was revise in 2004 by the establishment of the parole Reform and Terrorism Pr forceion run. Furthermore, the licenced FBI agents pass on not commit any(prenominal) wrong doing offences (Uwe, 2007). I leave similarly employ reference to live amongst the community. The informant will mainly be ex-US array officers whose credentials argon remarkable and go the required standards.I prefer using ex- military machine officers beca engross they atomic number 18 competent, trained to serve the nation frankincensely will thoroughly understand the grandness of their assignment and the need for them to ke ep their individualism in discretion. The agents will regularly be monitored to prevent the development of discrepancy behaviors against estimable and moral norms. I will to a fault make use of biometric fingerprint subroutine for all travelers leaving and entering the California state. It may be argued that this tactic will detain people unnecessarily thereby wasting their time and subjecting them to measures and challenges that are un erectifiable.However, the initiative will enable the California fatherland Security Department to prevent identity theft, use of fraudulent documents and terrorists from gaining access to the state consequently enhancing the national security and caoutchouc of California residents (Schmitt, 2007). The Status, Rights and Protections offered to Culprits of Terrorism In an taste of increasing the might and effectiveness of counterterrorism an decision maker order authorizing the interrogation and trial of extraneous terrorist suspects and unl awful combatants by a particular(a) military tribunal was passed in 2001.Therefore, an ex-American citizen captured in the United States in the act of terrorism should be considered as an prohibited competitor combatant. Thus I would not flutter to hand the culprit to the jurisdiction of the military commission of the United States, an act that will be in accordance with the (Military Commissions cloak (MCA) of 2006 that was passed by the sexual relation introducing the concept of illegal combatant into US legislation. Furthermore, the concept of illegal combatant enemies has been accepted by separate nations who have willingly handed over their sovereignty in this context to the US (Gill & Sliedregt, 2005).The establishment of the above legislations withdrew all the protections that were accorded to ex-American citizens. The uniform applies to foreign nationals caught engaging in terrorism in US, American citizens trash American forces abroad and foreign nationals that are non-military officials fighting American forces abroad. The above are all illegal combatant enemies of the state and thus also deserve to be seek before the jurisdiction of the military commission without the provision of Habeas corpus rights.The Habeas Corpus is a provision given to detained culprits to appeal for their relax incase of being detained unlawfull. The above subjects are liable(predicate) to torture in the event of collecting information that would increase the efficiency of the government and military to provide the US state national security. Therefore, I would fully hurt the idea of implementing torture as a method of extracting useful information to such culprits in an movement of defend the California residents (US Congress Joint answer, 2001). Perspectives Concerning merely contendJust contend is perpetuated by states in an attempt of protecting themselves from aggressive attack from other nations. However, for just war to be justifiable it should be u sed as a last resort problem of resolution the conflict that exists that is after all non-violent mechanisms of resolution conflicts are exhausted. Just wars should only be perpetuated by bodies that are recognized by the society as legitimate. A just war should be initiated if the presumed end results are beneficial where its success is guaranteed to prevent stopping point and suffering of innocent people in accordance to moral vices.The death of civilians can only be justified if they were haply killed by being in the region of the military targets. Therefore, just wars should initiate languish lasting peace between the nations that were under conflict. Furthermore, states are not supposed to use force when initiating just wars and in instances where such force must be enforced it should not exceed the injury or suffering caused. The war on terrorism can thus be categorise as a just war because it adheres to the above principles.However, it can cease to be a just war if it s destination is to spread terror, subject war on a non-state geological formation and if it aims at sidesplitting and hurting civilians (Fotion, 2007). Anti Americanism involves the negative aspect that individuals and state have over the political, economic, affectionate and cultural values of US. Anti Americanism has adversely affected the national security of US due to introduction of foreign ill will towards the US state for instance terrorism, thus curbing the effective attainment of stipulated US policy goals.Anti Americanism also affects the ability of US to conduct businesses abroad. This is unethical and thus not justifiable therefore individuals that perpetuate the input signal of violent acts against the American state should be held accountable for their actions and thus are liable to stand trial before the military commission. The US government has a right to protect the national security of the area by dealing with schools, mosques and charities that indirectl y birth terrorism while actually not directly engaging in the terrorism activities.The government prosecutes such individuals or organization with the aim of eliminating the terrorism concept and support that the individuals and organizations offer (US Congress Joint Resolution, 2001). the States PATRIOT Act The enactment of the regular army PATRIOTIC ACT after the 9/11 attack has substantially decreased terrorism in United States because the command and investigating powers of the US law enforcement officers was change magnitude especially with respect to internet use.However, if I were in Congress I would right to vote for the renewal of the Act to amend it. This is because the Act was enacted in haste without being subjected to Congress debate and house report to asseverate the consent of Senators. This fact resulted to the omission of a balance between civil shore leave and stipulated legislations (US Congress Joint Resolution, 2001). Word look at 1190 Reference List Fo tion, N. (2007). War and moral philosophy Just War Theory. New York Continuum. Gill, T. & Sliedregt, E.(2005). Guantanamo utter A Reflection on the legitimate Status and Rights of Unlawful Enemy Combatants. The Utrecht law Review, 1 (1). Retrieved on July, 6th, 2009 from http//www. utrechtlawreview. org. Schmitt, C. (2007). The Concept of the Political. simoleons University of Chicago Press. U. S. Congress Joint Resolution (2001). Authorization for Use of Military Force. macrocosm Law, 107(40), 115 Stat. 224. Uwe. S. (2007). On the Ethics of War and Terrorism. Oxford Oxford University Press.