Importance of the Tutor in Electra Essay -- electra

Importance of the Tutor in Electra When delving into a novel, drama or other character-based text, analysts often focus their search around the supposed study characters who seem to al roughly directly affect the work. In considering Electra, however, just as valuable as Orestes, Clytemnestra or Electra herself is a manywhat minor character, the Tutor. This incidental of Orestes emerges only three times and is on stage for less than twenty dollar bill percent of the spoken lines, yet his role in driving the diagram is as great as any. If Aristotle, one of the true masters of past thought, is correct in saying The Plot, then, is the first principle, and, as it were, the soul of a tragedy, then the Tutor can truly be considered one of the most significant characters in the entire drama. The relationship between the Tutor and Aristotles whim of tragedy can be carried further, for in his Poetics Aristotle claims, Tragedy is an imitation of an work that is complete and whole...A whole that has a beginning, a middle, and an end. If this is believed, the Tutors appearances become an even bankrupt match for the tragic form. His three presentations on stage are kind of auspicious numerically, and geometrically they form a nearly perfect pass out from beginning to middle to end. With each of these appearances the Tutor sets in motion some critical aspect of the plot, thus making himself an agent of some other of Aristotles notions scarcely most important of all is the structure of the incidents. For Tragedy is an imitation, not of men, only if of an action and of life, and life consists in action. The Tutor truly drives the action of this play, cognitive operation as a glue to hold the plot together and as a catalyst to keep it moving forward. ... ...alls him the only one I found / Remaining loyal at our fathers murder(1351-1352). such an composition brings the true depth of the Tutor into the open he is perhaps the most steadfast character in the ent ire drama, the one who committed himself to Orestes campaign not out of familial obligation but simply out of loyalty. The Tutor sets this play in motion, propels it in the middle and then continues it towards its end. Such a purposeful nature contrasts greatly with Electras, and without the Tutors influence this may conduct simply been a fifteen hundred line saga of her personal woes. though traditional analysis makes the Tutors role seem secondary, it is deceptively important, yet another deception that is quite appropriate for such an individual. Works CitedEuripides. Electra. Trans. Philip Vellacott. Medea and Other Plays. Baltimore Penguin Classics, 1963.